[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cal-tex.el landscape patch
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: cal-tex.el landscape patch |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Aug 2017 09:04:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50 |
On 2017-08-21, at 16:19, Vincent Belaïche <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Not being the maintainer of calendar, I would like to get your
> approval/brickbats/comments before commiting this : the objective is to
> make landscape by landscape class option + \usepackage{geometry}, rather
> than \special{landscape} in the preamble.
>
> The advantage of this way is that this it works directly if you compile
> with pdflatex, rather than latex+dvips+ps2pdf. To achieve this I had to
> change some of the function prototypes, the landscape argument is
> removed, and landscape option is passed just as another class option.
+1
And my 2 cents:
Not being the maintainer either, but sometimes a user, I'm for it.
However, I feel that cal-tex requires a general overhaul. The LaTeX
file it produces doesn't look really great (neither the source nor the
output). And it doesn't fit on A4.
I could try to do that overhaul. For starters, enable A4 calendars;
also, why not use TikZ to draw the boxes (at least as an option)? WDYT?
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
- cal-tex.el landscape patch, Vincent Belaïche, 2017/08/21
- Re: cal-tex.el landscape patch,
Marcin Borkowski <=
- Re: cal-tex.el landscape patch, Glenn Morris, 2017/08/24
- RE: cal-tex.el landscape patch, Vincent Belaïche, 2017/08/25
- RE: cal-tex.el landscape patch, Vincent Belaïche, 2017/08/25
- Re: cal-tex.el landscape patch, Edward Reingold, 2017/08/25
- RE: cal-tex.el landscape patch, Vincent Belaïche, 2017/08/26
- RE: cal-tex.el landscape patch, Vincent Belaïche, 2017/08/26
- Re: cal-tex.el landscape patch, Paul Eggert, 2017/08/28
- Re: cal-tex.el landscape patch, Glenn Morris, 2017/08/28
- RE: cal-tex.el landscape patch, Vincent Belaïche, 2017/08/30