[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: line-number-mode at EOB
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: line-number-mode at EOB |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:51:22 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:30:36 -0400
>
> I think if we want to make things consistent with the
> display-line-numbers, then it's display-line-numbers which should be
> changed to also display the number on the "non-existing" line after
> a final LF.
But there's no line there. Why should we have a number where there's
no line?
> If that's too difficult
It's not too easy, because that line is identical to all the rest
below it, as far as the display engine is concerned: they are all "at
EOB".
- line-number-mode at EOB (was: Native display of line numbers, improved), Stephen Berman, 2017/07/17
- Re: line-number-mode at EOB, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/18
- Re: line-number-mode at EOB, Stephen Berman, 2017/07/18
- Re: line-number-mode at EOB, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/18
- Re: line-number-mode at EOB,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: line-number-mode at EOB, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/18
- Re: line-number-mode at EOB, Paul Eggert, 2017/07/20
- Re: line-number-mode at EOB, Stephen Berman, 2017/07/20
- Re: line-number-mode at EOB, Paul Eggert, 2017/07/20
- Re: line-number-mode at EOB, Stephen Berman, 2017/07/20
Re: line-number-mode at EOB (was: Native display of line numbers, improved), Eli Zaretskii, 2017/07/18