[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Improving GNU ELPA
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Improving GNU ELPA |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:16:13 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Are those complicated workflows for "subtree" packages only?
> Yes (and only if you use a separate upstream).
Using a separate upstream can be ok, if we ensure proper rules are
followed, to avoid difficulties.
What are the current rules for using a separate upstream
in ELPA?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, (continued)
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/17
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/17
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/17
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/19
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/18
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/19
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/23
- Re: Improving GNU ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/24
Re: Adding advisory notification for non-ELPA package.el downloads, Paul Rankin, 2017/07/20