[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Jul 2017 21:46:50 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
> It could mean re-evaluating the legal papers process, instead, to
> ensure that it can be conducted entirely online. There was a bit of
> discussion on that topic in the past, and this push to get legal
> papers for Magit could be a good occasion to revisit it.
Do you not imagine that the FSF appreciates that completing the
assignment process is an issue for some people, and have already made it
as simple as the legal system allows?
https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/fsf-to-begin-accepting-gpg-signatures-for-copyright-assignments-from-italy
"We are always working on ways to make assignment itself simpler."
- In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit (was: comparing code on different branches), John Yates, 2017/07/05
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Glenn Morris, 2017/07/05
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/07/06
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Kaushal Modi, 2017/07/06
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Óscar Fuentes, 2017/07/06
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/06