Re: building/using address-sanitizer-enabled emacs?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 07:46:43 -0700
> 
> Still, it would make Emacs performance worse and as I understand it this 
> is the main reason this approach has not been incorporated thus far.

No, the reason is that the decision has not yet been made.

> > This limitation is exactly the reason why we will soon have to decide
> > whether we merge the branch and start using it, improving what can be
> > improved and living with that which cannot, or keep using unexec
> Those are not the only two choices available to us.

What are the alternatives?