Re: If records are not sequences, why does aref work on records?

[Lars Brinkhoff]

Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> OK, given what you and Stefan have said, for backward-compatibility
> reasons copy-sequence should work on records. This means Emacs doesn't
> need a copy-record function, as people can just use copy-sequence. I
> installed the attached patch to do that, and to try to document the
> current low-level behavior better.

Some EIEIO tests now fail.  I haven't yet checked if it's because of
this particular change, but it seems a likely candidate.