[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build failure on Windows
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: Build failure on Windows |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:11:20 +0100 |
> I don't think master is broken, or that these things will become
> better in the future.
"These things" did not happen in the past ten years.
> One recipe to avoid hitting these problems is
> to resync with upstream more often, because that minimizes the number
> of Lisp files that need to be recompiled, and lowers the probability
> of hitting some circular dependency with macros or somesuch.
I used to synch with master once a day on a regular basis. I stopped
doing that after build failures started to pile up.
martin
- Re: Build failure on Windows, (continued)
- Re: Build failure on Windows, martin rudalics, 2017/03/05
- Re: Build failure on Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/05
- Re: Build failure on Windows, martin rudalics, 2017/03/05
- Re: Build failure on Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/05
- Re: Build failure on Windows, martin rudalics, 2017/03/06
- Re: Build failure on Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/05
- Re: Build failure on Windows, martin rudalics, 2017/03/05
- Re: Build failure on Windows, Paul Eggert, 2017/03/05
- Re: Build failure on Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/05
- Re: Build failure on Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/05
- Re: Build failure on Windows,
martin rudalics <=
- Re: Build failure on Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/06
- Re: Build failure on Windows, martin rudalics, 2017/03/06
- Re: Build failure on Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/06
- Re: Build failure on Windows, martin rudalics, 2017/03/07
- Re: Build failure on Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/07
- Re: Build failure on Windows, martin rudalics, 2017/03/07
- Re: Build failure on Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/07
Re: Build failure on Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/05