[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ELPA] New package: hap.el
From: |
Nicolas Petton |
Subject: |
Re: [ELPA] New package: hap.el |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Mar 2017 13:38:21 +0100 |
Tino Calancha <address@hidden> writes:
> Probably would be safer default to `assoc' in `map-elt'. That is
> consistent with the default test in `map-contains-key' and with
> the hash table test in `map--into-hash-table'.
I just realized that then it wouldn't be consistent with `alist-get'
though.
Cheers,
Nico
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [ELPA] New package: hap.el, Tino Calancha, 2017/03/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: hap.el, Mark Oteiza, 2017/03/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: hap.el, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: hap.el, Tino Calancha, 2017/03/02
- Re: [ELPA] New package: hap.el, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/02
- Re: [ELPA] New package: hap.el, Tino Calancha, 2017/03/02
- Re: [ELPA] New package: hap.el, Nicolas Petton, 2017/03/02
- Re: [ELPA] New package: hap.el, Tino Calancha, 2017/03/02
- Re: [ELPA] New package: hap.el, Nicolas Petton, 2017/03/02
- Re: [ELPA] New package: hap.el,
Nicolas Petton <=
- Re: [ELPA] New package: hap.el, Tino Calancha, 2017/03/02