[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Feb 2017 19:35:06 +0200 |
> From: Jordon Biondo <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:28:06 -0500
> Cc: John Wiegley <address@hidden>, Emacs development discussions
> <address@hidden>
>
> Below is an updated patch of the change.
Thanks, this will need documentation changes to go with it. And it
looks like the patch is large enough to require legal paperwork.
Would you like me to send you the forms to start that rolling?
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Tino Calancha, 2017/02/01
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, John Wiegley, 2017/02/01
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/01
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Jordon Biondo, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Jordon Biondo, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Jordon Biondo, 2017/02/08
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/10