[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change in files.el
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Change in files.el |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:46:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Can add-function infer that a -function variable with a value of "nil" is
> equivalent to it having a value of 'ignore?
As Leo pointed out, in 99% of the cases, nil is not equivalent to
`ignore' in those variables. And if it were, then what would be the
benefit to use nil instead of using `ignore' as the default value?
Stefan
- Re: Change in files.el, (continued)
- Re: Change in files.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/28
- Re: Change in files.el, Stefan Monnier, 2017/01/28
- Re: Change in files.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/28
- Re: Change in files.el, Stefan Monnier, 2017/01/28
- Re: Change in files.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/28
- Re: Change in files.el, John Wiegley, 2017/01/29
- Re: Change in files.el, Leo Liu, 2017/01/29
- Re: Change in files.el, John Wiegley, 2017/01/30
- Re: Change in files.el, Leo Liu, 2017/01/30
- Re: Change in files.el, John Wiegley, 2017/01/31
- Re: Change in files.el,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Change in files.el, Kaushal Modi, 2017/01/31
- Default value of variables named `*-function' [was: Change in files.el], Drew Adams, 2017/01/31
- Re: Change in files.el, Mark Oteiza, 2017/01/28
- Re: Change in files.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/28
- Re: Change in files.el, Mark Oteiza, 2017/01/31
- Re: Change in files.el, Richard Stallman, 2017/01/28