Re: with-url

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:

> If you feel url-future is not right for `with-url', how about
> `with-url-future' with different call semantics but the same internals?

I'm completely indifferent to the presence of a "future" version of
`with-url'.  :-)  I'm sure one can be trivially made from `with-url' if
suddenly all Emacs web programmers become future-crazy.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no