[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:02:30 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 21:50:56 +0000
> From: Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden>
>
> First forward run Backwards Second forward run
>
> master: 34.100s 36.050s 34.575s
>
> comment-cache: 30.110s 32.275s 34.990s
> [...]
> I would like the comment-cache code to be merged into master soon.
Given that the speed-up is around 11% - 13%, and only for the first
scan, what are the other advantages/benefits of this code that would
cause us to merge it?
Thanks.
- The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/23
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/23
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/23
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Andreas Röhler, 2016/12/24
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/27
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/28