[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 26.0.50; CEDET stickyfunc-mode broken after recent removal of defaul
From: |
Andrew Moore |
Subject: |
Re: 26.0.50; CEDET stickyfunc-mode broken after recent removal of default-FOO variables |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:24:54 -0500 |
> Andrew Moore <address@hidden> writes:
>> CEDET stickyfunc-mode appears to be broken after recent commits:
>>
>> e6681b27394a23979c3aef3925f78ef9cd75bd32 (“Nix more uses of default-FOO
>> variables (Bug#24946)”),
>> 73d47d22197175f08b2dd62e76d7138872e611d2 (“Remove obsolete default-FOO
>> variables”)
>>
>> Being enamored of stickyfunc-mode, I’m hoping that someone might point
>> me in the direction of a resolution. What I have so far is only a
>> partial workaround.
>>
>> Prior to the above commits, CEDET and stickyfunc-mode were enabled
>> globally via the following lines in my .emacs:
>>
>> (load (concat cedet-load-path "/semantic/loaddefs.el"))
>> (semantic-mode)
>> (mapc
>> (lambda (mode)
>> (funcall mode 1))
>> '(global-semantic-idle-summary-mode
>> global-semantic-idle-completions-mode
>> global-semantic-idle-scheduler-mode
>> global-semanticdb-minor-mode))
>> global-semantic-stickyfunc-mode))
>
On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:00 PM, Mark Oteiza <address@hidden> wrote:
> Without the cedet-load-path line, the above works fine here (as the sole
> contents of init.el) on e6681b27 (the latest commit listed above). I
> can open C files and sticky mode is operational. Are you loading CEDET
> from somewhere else?
Indeed, I’m not able to reproduce the problem myself now (other than
stickyfunc-mode isn’t working for lisp-mode, which may have been the
confounding issue). So false report. I’ll try to be more careful. Thank you
for checking!
-AM