[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we go GTK-only?
From: |
Nikolaus Rath |
Subject: |
Re: Can we go GTK-only? |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:25:03 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
On Nov 02 2016, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>> "Should", not "will". And on some systems, only with very recent
>> library versions.
>
> Again: which system are you think of that's had a buggy
> malloc-with-threads in the last, say, ten years?
GNU libc on Linux in 2008, it seems:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6952
(Just providing the link, personally I think that even with such bugs it
it safe to assume a threadsafe malloc both then and now. Otherwise you
may just as well assume that nothing works anywhere at all).
Best,
Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, (continued)
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?,
Nikolaus Rath <=
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, John Wiegley, 2016/11/03
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, John Wiegley, 2016/11/03