Re: compiler warnings for "unused" method specializers

[Stefan Monnier]

> My other instinct was to just put "_" for all unused parameters, but if
> there's more than one of those, the compiler complains about repeated
> variables.

It'd be nice to change the byte-compiler so it doesn't complain about
repeated variables for _.

> For what it's worth, Lispworks does not complain about unused eql
> parameters in defmethods.  It would make sense if Emacs didn't, either.

Indeed for eql specializers, it could make sense to silence the
byte-compiler warnings, but at the same time, I'm not sure it's worth
the trouble to handle this case specially.


        Stefan