[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
|
From: |
Helmut Eller |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
|
Date: |
Sun, 09 Oct 2016 00:15:55 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sat, Oct 08 2016, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Namespace systems do not fit well into Lisp.
The designers and users of the most important Lisps obviously disagree
with you: Common Lisp, Scheme (since R6RS) and Clojure all have either
namespaces or modules. Racket even has both.
Helmut
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/08
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/08
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Nicolas Petton, 2016/10/08
Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Helmut Eller <=
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/10
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/10
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/11
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/10/11
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/11
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/13
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/13
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/16
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Georges Ko, 2016/10/10
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/10