[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Staying in the same place"
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: "Staying in the same place" |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Apr 2016 21:52:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Karl Fogel <address@hidden> writes:
> Yes, absolutely. A "fuzzily recorded position" should be a
> first-class object that can be passed around like any value. There
> can be a macro that generates and consumes such objects entirely
> internally to the macro, but the objects can also be generated
> explicitly in code and consumed later.
This sounds great to me. :-)
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- "Staying in the same place", Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/04
- Re: "Staying in the same place", Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/04
- Re: "Staying in the same place", Stefan Monnier, 2016/04/04
- Re: "Staying in the same place", Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/04
- Re: "Staying in the same place", Stefan Monnier, 2016/04/04
- Re: "Staying in the same place", Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/04
- Re: "Staying in the same place", Karl Fogel, 2016/04/04
- Re: "Staying in the same place", Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/04
- Re: "Staying in the same place", Karl Fogel, 2016/04/04
- Re: "Staying in the same place",
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: "Staying in the same place", John Wiegley, 2016/04/04
- RE: "Staying in the same place", Drew Adams, 2016/04/04