Re: [PATCH v3] Add systemd socket launching support

[Stefan Monnier]

>> > I'm not sure myself, but I'm not a criminal, so don't ask me about the
>> > details.  I just know that exposing a handle through which someone can
>> > feed Emacs any commands they want is a bad idea.
>> Which part of my proposal exposes such a handle?
> You asked for the original version, which did that.  That's the only
> proposal I understand you made, and that's what I was talking about.

Then I don't know wheat you mean by "expose".  It's already readily
available from the environment, so in which way is it more exposed?
I mean, yes, it's more conveniently available, but it's not like it's
otherwise "hidden" in anyway.


        Stefan