[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Asynchronous DNS
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Asynchronous DNS |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Feb 2016 12:35:22 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
>> Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 18:49:43 +1100
>>
>> I kinda think we've gotten as far as we're going to get in this
>> discussion, and that it's time to merge.
>
> I'm sorry, but I disagree. I think the APIs that expect a fully
> functional process object should wait for the DNS resolution to
> complete, before they do anything.
I don't know what you mean by that. That is exactly what the API does.
>> There should be no impact on any existing use. It should be 100%
>> backward compatible.
>
> But it isn't, as was demonstrated by ERC. And it cannot be 100%
> backward compatible, unless the above-mentioned waiting is added to
> the affected APIs.
Again, it is not demonstrated by ERC. ERC works fine with the new
refactoring.
I'm beginning to suspect that you're kinda just skimming my messages.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, (continued)
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/07
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Alain Schneble, 2016/02/07
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/07
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, John Wiegley, 2016/02/08
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Rasmus, 2016/02/08
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/08
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/08
- Re: Asynchronous DNS,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/07
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/07
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/08
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, John Wiegley, 2016/02/07
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/07
Re: Asynchronous DNS, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/01