|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: Next release from master |
Date: | Fri, 22 Jan 2016 04:28:56 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/44.0 |
On 01/22/2016 04:01 AM, John Wiegley wrote:
I'm not sure yet what the best "role" for master is. Should it accumulate new work toward 25.2 while we work on 25.1, or should it accumulate work toward 26.1?
Why not get back to the simpler scheme? "New work" will go into the next major release (26.1, in this case), into master.
25.2 should only contain the minor tweaks and fixes we would accept into 25.1 now (with feature freeze in effect), but don't manage to get into 25.1 because of lack of time, or in case the respective bugs get filed too late (after 25.1's release).
So, 25.2 might not get released at all. But it probably will, and it'll be cut from emacs-25, like the branch's name implies.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |