[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.
From: |
Karl Fogel |
Subject: |
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:46:43 -0600 |
On Nov 11, 2015 3:36 PM, "John Wiegley" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Artur Malabarba <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I’ll fix your “C-o at start of line” problem right away, but, if noone
> > opposes, I’d like to maintain the current behaviour when typing C-o in the
> > middle of a line. Is that alright?
>
> Sounds good to me.
+1 here too. You make the fix, Artur, and I'll be happy to add the note to etc/NEWS (unless you beat me to it).
Best regards,
-K
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., (continued)
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Paul Eggert, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/11
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., David Kastrup, 2015/11/11
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Andreas Röhler, 2015/11/12