[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:25:20 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:15:07 +0300
>
> On 10/10/2015 02:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > Are you saying that high-level design is generally not useful, and
> > should be avoided, unless "justified"?
>
> A justification would further the discussion. Simply asking for a big
> design, doesn't.
It's standard software engineering practice, why should you ask for
its justification?
> >> If Company's tooltip is not pleasant, what would be pleasant for
> >> you?
> >
> > I just gave you 2 examples.
>
> You didn't explain how they are better.
They look nicer. I don't know how to explain better.
> > And it's not really about me, it's about the expectations of users out
> > there. Don't they expect something they see elsewhere?
>
> Sometimes. A common question is for a popup that doesn't conflict with
> other packages that use overlay rendering for other things.
The other IDEs use something similar to a tooltip, or a drop-down menu
with different fonts and colors.
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: IDE, martin rudalics, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, martin rudalics, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/12