[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New maintainer
From: |
David Engster |
Subject: |
Re: New maintainer |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Oct 2015 22:48:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
John Wiegley writes:
> I interpret him as meaning that the support should not favor non-GCC compilers
> in any way, not that GCC should determine the least upper bound on
> functionality.
I'd suggest to read the past discussion on this to better understand
Richard's position. There's a good summary at LWN:
http://lwn.net/Articles/629259/
-David
- Re: New maintainer, (continued)
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Jay Belanger, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Jay Belanger, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, David Kastrup, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer,
David Engster <=
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Jay Belanger, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, David Kastrup, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Karl Fogel, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, David Kastrup, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Karl Fogel, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Phillip Lord, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Phillip Lord, 2015/10/08