[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?
From: |
Nicolas Petton |
Subject: |
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib? |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:13:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.19 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.50.6 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) |
Mark Oteiza <address@hidden> writes:
> Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Commit d605a539d4863c7e7c66aaea6e538ae14c47f3d7 broke Emacs when winner
>> was enabled without cl-lib being loaded. Nobody seems to have noticed
>> until now, which suggests that either almost nobody uses winner, or
>> almost everybody has cl-lib loaded anyway. Maybe it's time to just dump
>> cl-lib with Emacs.
>
> Bug#21549
>
> I'd be happy to have more useful functions in "core". (Can we have
> `filter` yet?)
It's not in "core", it's not preloaded, but seq.el provides useful
additional sequence-manipulation functions such as `seq-filter'.
Nico
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, (continued)
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Artur Malabarba, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Andreas Schwab, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Artur Malabarba, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Rasmus, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Oleh Krehel, 2015/10/08
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Mark Oteiza, 2015/10/08
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/10/08
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/10/08
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08