|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: Upcoming loss of usability of Emacs source files and Emacs. |
Date: | Thu, 18 Jun 2015 22:39:17 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Good point. Instead they use some kind of escaping convention so as to >> avoid ambiguity. We could try that. > And we already do! > We use `\\=', as documented in `substitute-command-keys'. Several problems: - it's butt-ugly. - I can never remember it (why can't we use a standard quoting convention). - The ambiguity shows up not only in the source docstring, but also in the *formatted* docstring after this quoting has been removed (e.g. regexp to recognize `...' xrefs and highlight them). - Same ambiguity shows up in other formatted outputs (e.g. Info files). IOW there are various places where `...' is used and some of them offer some kind of quoting while others don't. Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |