[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function liter
From: |
René Kyllingstad |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:35:40 +0100 |
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:17 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> That does not mean that I am convinced we want or need short-lambda.
Both C++ and Java have "recently" added a succinct syntax for their equivalents.
Given the amount of work it is to add features to either platform,
quite a few people
deemed it useful there.
At least most peoples .emacs will look a bit tidier with a succinct
anonymous lambda
as an argument to add-hook :)
The syntax proposed by OP is the neatest so far, but any succinct
syntax will probably be ok.
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Tassilo Horn, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Artur Malabarba, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Phillip Lord, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal,
René Kyllingstad <=
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, David Kastrup, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, David Kastrup, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Artur Malabarba, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Phillip Lord, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, David Kastrup, 2015/01/23