[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Dec 2014 07:46:45 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I've left out the preamble of the manual that defines the title, among
> other things. In general I'd thing Org would need to have a derived
> export backend for the kind of manuals you are thingkning about that
> took care about these things.
Documentation of how to write such things in Org format
is part of what is needed for Org format to be a candidate
for a GNU documentation format.
> > Is there a way to distinguish between emphasis and definitional
> > occurrences and variable values? In Texinfo, @emph and @dfn and @var.
> > They all appear as italic in printed manuals, but may be different
> > in other output formats.
> See, that's one thing no "unobtrusive" or "visual" markup can provide.
I do see that it is not straightforward -- but this feature is
something we need.
> For Org, it seems that macros would be the way to go unless we'd come up
> with yet another mechanism for semantic markup.
What would this look like?
A solution that occurs to me is to use character pair brackets, such
as _*foo*_ and _#foo#_ and *#foo#*. These would provide enough
alternatives to make the necessary distinctions.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, (continued)
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/11
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Phillip Lord, 2014/12/11
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/11
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Phillip Lord, 2014/12/11
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/11
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/11
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/11
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Achim Gratz, 2014/12/11
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/12
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Achim Gratz, 2014/12/12
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Achim Gratz, 2014/12/13
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/15
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Achim Gratz, 2014/12/15
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Phillip Lord, 2014/12/16
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/16
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Yuri Khan, 2014/12/16
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/17
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Achim Gratz, 2014/12/17
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/21
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/15