[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:52:28 +0300 |
> From: Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:33:04 +0200
> Cc: Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden>,
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> Note that Guile-Emacs runs existing Elisp as-is and is basically a
> drop-in replacement.
But that's not really true, is it? Just look at the changes made in
the Guile-Emacs repo to core Lisp files, and you will see what I mean.
Btw, I admit I don't completely understand what the wiki says about
the problems with t and nil, but if that means you cannot say in
Guile-Emacs something like
(if (eq foo t) ...
then there are more than 700 places in Emacs that will stop working.
- Re: Adding packages to ELPA, (continued)
- Re: Adding packages to ELPA, Stephen Leake, 2014/09/20
- Re: Adding packages to ELPA, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/20
- Re: Adding packages to ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2014/09/19
- Re: Adding packages to ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Daniel Colascione, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eric Brown, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Robin Templeton, 2014/09/20
Re: Guile emacs thread (again), LluĂs, 2014/09/17
Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Robin Templeton, 2014/09/18