[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Hash values of symbols: why look at the name?
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Hash values of symbols: why look at the name? |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:19:02 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 |
Right now, this form always evaluates to t:
(eql (sxhash (make-symbol "a")) (sxhash (make-symbol "a")))
This form always evaluates to nil:
(equal (make-symbol "a") (make-symbol "a"))
The hash of a symbol is the hash of its namel; that seems silly, since
symbol equality is based on identity. We should be able to just use the
symbol address instead, right?
=== modified file 'src/fns.c'
--- src/fns.c 2014-09-15 05:09:44 +0000
+++ src/fns.c 2014-09-16 00:14:52 +0000
@@ -4482,13 +4482,10 @@
break;
case Lisp_Misc:
+ case Lisp_Symbol:
hash = XHASH (obj);
break;
- case Lisp_Symbol:
- obj = SYMBOL_NAME (obj);
- /* Fall through. */
-
case Lisp_String:
hash = sxhash_string (SSDATA (obj), SBYTES (obj));
break;
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Hash values of symbols: why look at the name?,
Daniel Colascione <=