|
| From: | Paul Eggert |
| Subject: | Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings] |
| Date: | Wed, 03 Sep 2014 11:00:18 -0700 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
Is (2) actually valid? I mean, are we allowed to refer (via a reference) to a variable that's in a block we already exited?
You're right of course: (2) won't work. Thanks for catching that. (3) is better these days anyway, I expect, as it relies only on C99 features and we're already assuming C99 in the trunk.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |