Re: Should 'old-branches' and 'other-branches' be kept?

[Stefan Monnier]

> I'm looking at the old0branches and other-branches remote groups.  It
> seems pretty clear that most of these were either marged to trunk or
> abandoned during the CVS period.  Are any of them worth keeping
> around?

http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/emacs/README says:

   [...]
   `old-branches' Directory of branches that have been merged into trunk 
already.
   `other-branches' Directory of various other branches.
   [...]

I don't see any point in getting rid of them, tho.


        Stefan