Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:

> I followed up to Lars specifically so I could explain that I thought
> (after a few months of letting things rest) that loose coupling of
> *encryption* features specifically was a bad idea.

Yeah, I think that's an important point.  Encryption is, I think,
especially fiddly to get right.  That is, there are plenty of projects
that have gotten it wrong over the years.  Using the C interfaces in the
intended way would help a bit.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/