[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Git transition checklist
From: |
Dani Moncayo |
Subject: |
Re: Git transition checklist |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Jan 2014 00:07:44 +0100 |
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Glenn Morris <address@hidden> wrote:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
>> You can just add another remote to your clone that points to the elpa
>> repository. Git doesn't really care where the commits originate from,
>> once they are in your repository all are alike.
>
> The instructions for committing to / fetching from Emacs will be made
> more complicated by the existence of two separate repos, with weirdly
> different but confusingly similar names.
>
> (You did not answer the question "What's the reason _not_ to share them?".)
Because then, switching between the elpa branch and any "core" branch
would be a much heavyweight (slower) operation. By contrast,
switching between "core" branches should be almost instantaneous.
--
Dani Moncayo
- Re: Git transition checklist, (continued)
- Re: Git transition checklist, Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/08
- Re: Git transition checklist, Glenn Morris, 2014/01/08
- Re: Git transition checklist, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/08
- Re: Git transition checklist, Glenn Morris, 2014/01/08
- Re: Git transition checklist, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/08
- Re: Git transition checklist, Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/08
- Re: Git transition checklist, Glenn Morris, 2014/01/08
- Re: Git transition checklist, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/08
- Re: Git transition checklist,
Dani Moncayo <=
- Re: Git transition checklist, Bob Proulx, 2014/01/12
- Re: Git transition checklist, Bastien, 2014/01/13
Re: Git transition checklist, Bastien, 2014/01/08
Re: Git transition checklist, Glenn Morris, 2014/01/08