[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jan 2014 05:47:21 +0200 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 01:12:31 +0100
>
> > Would you suggest that someone uses Emacs as a fancy Notepad, just
> > because the rest is not really needed? I doubt that.
>
> If Notepad deals badly with R2L text, overlong lines and other stuff I
> want to be working with
It doesn't.
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, (continued)
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Sean Sieger, 2014/01/05
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, David Kastrup, 2014/01/05
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Rostislav Svoboda, 2014/01/05
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Karl Fogel, 2014/01/05
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Jay Belanger, 2014/01/05
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Karl Fogel, 2014/01/06
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Jay Belanger, 2014/01/06
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Jay Belanger, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Sebastian Wiesner, 2014/01/05
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, David Kastrup, 2014/01/05
Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Karl Fogel, 2014/01/04
Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, grischka, 2014/01/06