[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: info files
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: info files |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Dec 2013 10:02:22 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> having "make" rebuild docs doesn't *violate* the standard,
> does it?
True.
> AFAICS, it would be a one-time annoyance per existing
> checkout: the first time you rebuild after the commit of "bzr rm
> info", it would take a noticable amount of time. But surely it's
> hardly noticable in a "make bootstrap".
It takes quite some time even compared to a "make bootstrap",
I'm afraid. On my platform (AMD Phenom II X4 910e, texinfo 5.2),
a fresh "make info" takes 3 minutes 19 seconds. It can be parallelized with
"make -j",
but some developers are still using older single-core machines,
considerably slower than what I use.
Plus, one doesn't need to run "make bootstrap" from a fresh checkout.
- info files, Stephen Berman, 2013/12/23
- Re: info files, Andreas Schwab, 2013/12/23
- info files, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/12/23
- Re: info files, Paul Eggert, 2013/12/24
- Re: info files, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/12/24
- Re: info files,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: info files, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/12/24
- Re: info files, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2013/12/24
- Re: info files, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2013/12/24
- Re: info files, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/12/24
- Re: info files, Stefan Monnier, 2013/12/24