[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SHA, MD, and openssl
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: SHA, MD, and openssl |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Dec 2013 07:21:55 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
But SHA1 and SHA256 are commonly available accelerated in hardware.
For this very small subset of routines should we not consider
libcrypto as a system library to these hardware specific interfaces.
This has nothing to do with what we "should consider".
It is a legal criterion stated in the GPL.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, (continued)
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/12/09
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Richard Stallman, 2013/12/10
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Paul Eggert, 2013/12/10
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Richard Stallman, 2013/12/11
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Paul Eggert, 2013/12/11
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Pádraig Brady, 2013/12/11
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Glenn Morris, 2013/12/11
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/12/12
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Richard Stallman, 2013/12/12
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Pádraig Brady, 2013/12/12
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Pádraig Brady, 2013/12/13
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Richard Stallman, 2013/12/13
Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Rüdiger Sonderfeld, 2013/12/09