[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Rectangular regions
|
From: |
Drew Adams |
|
Subject: |
RE: Rectangular regions |
|
Date: |
Sat, 2 Nov 2013 08:30:39 -0700 (PDT) |
> > Users who use the function frequently can put it on an more
> > accessible sequence.
>
> So, please provide multiple bindings
Why?
> If the number and nature of what the new mode can potentially
> do is a bit unclear, it might actually be better NOT to choose
> a prefix key right now.
Why?
C'mon folks. Let's try to give reasons for our suggestions.
- RE: Rectangular regions, (continued)
- RE: Rectangular regions, Drew Adams, 2013/11/01
- RE: Rectangular regions, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/11/02
- Re: Rectangular regions, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/02
- Re: Rectangular regions, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/11/02
- Re: [SPAM] Re: Rectangular regions, Jarek Czekalski, 2013/11/02
- Re: [SPAM] Re: Rectangular regions, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/11/02
- Re: [SPAM] Re: Rectangular regions, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/02
- Re: [SPAM] Re: Rectangular regions, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/11/02
- Re: [SPAM] Re: Rectangular regions, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/02
- Re: [SPAM] Re: Rectangular regions, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/11/03
- RE: Rectangular regions,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Rectangular regions, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/02
- Re: Rectangular regions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/02
- Re: Rectangular regions, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/03
Re: Rectangular regions, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/11/01
Re: Rectangular regions, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/11/01