[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eww
From: |
John Williams |
Subject: |
Re: eww |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Aug 2013 11:46:15 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
> John Williams <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> As I mentioned, calling eww with my .emacs included produces an error,
>> but `emacs -q` does not. I saved the two buffers and diffed them.
>> The only difference was the timestamps ("Date" and "Expires").
>
> What two buffers are you diffing?
>
>> But now something is different with the way the page is rendered. When
>> I previously reported this (perhaps) bug, nothing was displayed at all.
>> In the intervening time I've changed my .emacs (but don't have a
>> changelog, sorry) and now the DDG page is _partially_ displayed. The
>> top line of the buffer reads "https://duckduckgo.com/html/?q=" and the
>> cursor is blinking on the next line.
>>
>> But I can't enter anything, and the text entry field is not displayed.
>> The eww menu is displayed and works fine.
>
> But if you start emacs with -Q, then everything works fine? Then I'd
> suggest trying to remove stuff from your .emacs until it starts working.
Ironically, it was the latest version of Gnus that seemed to be causing
the problem! When I commented out:
(setq load-path (cons (expand-file-name "~/.emacs.d/src/gnus/lisp") load-path))
(require 'gnus-load)
the warning about package assoc being obsolete disappeared, and eww now
works fine!
The code in that directory was cloned from git a couple of weeks ago. I
can't tell what version it is, because the ChangeLog does not seem to be
current.
Is there anything else I can do to help track down this behaviour?
Cheers,
John
- Re: eww, John Williams, 2013/08/01
- Re: eww, John Williams, 2013/08/01
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/01
- Re: eww, John Williams, 2013/08/01
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/02
- Re: eww, John Williams, 2013/08/02
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/03
- Re: eww, John Williams, 2013/08/04
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/04
- Re: eww, John Williams, 2013/08/04
- Re: eww,
John Williams <=
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/06
- Re: eww, Richard Stallman, 2013/08/02
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/03