[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reveal-filename
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: reveal-filename |
Date: |
Wed, 22 May 2013 11:46:16 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> > How about "Produce a canonical ..." or "Produce a normalized ..."?
>
> The problem is, it can be neither. If the argument is just "foo", it
> will be returned unchanged.
Well, yes, that's what "normalize" and "canonicalize" mean. If you
hand one of those operations an object already in normal form, it
won't be changed. If calling doing nothing "Produce" bothers you,
s/Produce/Return/.
- reveal-filename, Stefan Monnier, 2013/05/17
- Re: reveal-filename, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/18
- Re: reveal-filename, Stefan Monnier, 2013/05/20
- Re: reveal-filename, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/20
- Re: reveal-filename, Stefan Monnier, 2013/05/21
- Re: reveal-filename, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/05/21
- Re: reveal-filename, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/21
- Re: reveal-filename,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: reveal-filename, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/21
- Re: reveal-filename, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/21
- Re: reveal-filename, Stefan Monnier, 2013/05/21
- Re: reveal-filename, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/25
- Re: reveal-filename, Richard Stallman, 2013/05/26