[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development
From: |
Teemu Likonen |
Subject: |
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:21:38 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Barry Warsaw [2013-04-02 11:45:08 -0400] wrote:
> On Apr 02, 2013, at 06:13 PM, Teemu Likonen wrote:
>> There have been ideas why Git is inferior to its competitors. Yet it
>> became the leader.
>
> Network effects are powerful, but don't always lead to the best
> choice.
True, I guess. But many large projects use Git and I believe they are
competent programmers and people who know what they want. Do you think
that Git is wrong tool for many people who are using it now?
> OTOH, I still suspect that dvcs adoption is miles behind traditional
> vcses such as Subversion.
Maybe, but among Debian GNU/Linux users Git surpassed Subversion's
popularity in the mid 2011. Below is a graph from Debian's automatic
popularity contest. It's a "vote" graph which shows if the binary files
in the packages have been accessed recently (atime).
http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=git%2Cmercurial%2Cbzr%2Csubversion&show_vote=on&want_legend=on&from_date=2010-01-01&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1
The "install" graph looks the same. This is just about machines that
have packages installed.
http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=git%2Cmercurial%2Cbzr%2Csubversion&show_installed=on&want_legend=on&from_date=2010-05-01&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1
Here's again the "vote" graph but only for bzr and mercurial packages.
It seems that Bzr's trend is subtle downhill but it's too early to tell
for sure.
http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=mercurial%2Cbzr&show_vote=on&want_legend=on&from_date=2010-05-01&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1
pgpgA1_JkXqRH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, (continued)
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Teemu Likonen, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Teemu Likonen, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Teemu Likonen, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/02
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/04/02
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Alan Mackenzie, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Teemu Likonen, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Barry Warsaw, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development,
Teemu Likonen <=
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Miles Bader, 2013/04/03
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/02
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Alan Mackenzie, 2013/04/02
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Barry Warsaw, 2013/04/02
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stefan Monnier, 2013/04/03