[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bzr Emacs question
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Bzr Emacs question |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Nov 2012 22:43:51 +0200 |
> From: Bill Wohler <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:22:28 -0800
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> From: Bill Wohler <address@hidden>
> >> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 09:47:31 -0800
> >>
> >> > A tag is not a revision-id by itself. Try
> >> >
> >> > bzr up -r tag:mh-e-8.3.1
> >>
> >> Not surprisingly, that produces the same error.
> >
> > I guess I don't understand what your "bzr tag" command did. What is
> > "emacs-24.1" in that command?
>
> I want the mh-e-8.3.1 tag to correspond to the Emacs 24.1 release. I had
> assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that the emacs-24.1 tag was what I wanted.
In what branch did you issue that "bzr tag" command?
> >> > (And I'm not sure you really want "up" and not some other command, but
> >> > that's another story.)
> >>
> >> What would you recommend as an alternative to "svn up -r<revision>"?
> >
> > I don't know, I never used SVN seriously. What did you want to
> > accomplish?
>
> I want to grab the MH-E files associated with the Emacs 24.1 release in
> order to make an MH-E 8.3.1 release.
If you want to update the tree to a certain revision, I think
"bzr revert" is a better choice, because "update" will leave any
uncommitted changes you might have.
Re: Bzr Emacs question, Bill Wohler, 2012/11/24
Re: Bzr Emacs question, Bill Wohler, 2012/11/24