Re: smie-next-sexp vs associative operators

[Stefan Monnier]

>> That would bring back some of the benefits, but not those for
>> indentation and I still haven't seen a concrete case where such
>> a setting in indentation would be useful (I'm not saying your case isn't
>> one such example, but I still haven't seen your concrete case).
> I started this thread with a specific example.

No.  By specific example, I meant also the corresponding
smie-indent-rules, which I haven't seen (if you included them, I missed
them).


        Stefan