Re: cl-pushnew and other functions

[Stefan Monnier]

>> Because I don't want to simply adopt all those Common-Lisp-isms into Elisp.
>> A big reason for that is that Elisp is not compiled aggressively, so some
>> design choices in Common-Lisp would be too costly in Elisp.
> Is it considered kosher yet to use cl.el's defun*?  I *really* miss keyword
> arguments in Elisp.

It's been accepted for a long time now (grep shows it's already in use),
tho I recommend you use the cl-defun name instead, so you only need to
require `cl-lib'.


        Stefan