[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rethinking count-words-region
From: |
Andreas Röhler |
Subject: |
Re: Rethinking count-words-region |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Oct 2011 19:58:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110920 SUSE/3.1.15 Thunderbird/3.1.15 |
Am 07.10.2011 22:55, schrieb Chong Yidong:
Chong Yidong<address@hidden> writes:
[ ... ] use-region-p, it counts in the region. This is like ispell-word.
And I guess we can call these commands count-words-region and
count-words, even if they also provide information about lines and
characters.
Hi,
think that's definitely the wrong path.
Its very important to express with command-names what they are doing.
If we have a command returning more than one thing, this must be spoken
out, not done silently.
if you want a combined command, reporting words-lines-chars,
name it that, or give an abbreviation wlc while explaining it for example.
Suggest to avoid unexpected multitudes,
thanks,
Andreas
- Rethinking count-words-region, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region,
Andreas Röhler <=
- RE: Rethinking count-words-region, Drew Adams, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/08
- RE: Rethinking count-words-region, Drew Adams, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Andreas Röhler, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/08
Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Andreas Röhler, 2011/10/07
Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/10/07