Re: ido-vc-dir anyone?

[Deniz Dogan]

On 08/26/2011 12:19 PM, Leo wrote:
> On 2011-08-25 23:53 +0800, Deniz Dogan wrote:
> > Attached is a patch suggestion which implements `ido-vc-dir' which is
> > an ido replacement for `vc-dir'.  There is some code duplication
> > (copied straight from the definition of `vc-dir'), which we probably
> > don't want.
> >
> > What do you think?
> Why do we need this? I just tried vc-dir and when ido-mode is used, it
> is already very convenient to use.

When I do vc-dir with ido-mode, I don't get ido-read-file-name, just the 
plain old read-file-name.