[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Memory leak due to bidi?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Memory leak due to bidi? |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Aug 2011 01:19:41 -0400 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 01:15:35 -0400
> Cc: Andy Moreton <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> >> I've no idea - I get similar performance from the command line. trying
> >> to use VC annotate on the file within emacs was taking forever - I
> >> didn't find out how long as I was too impatient to wait for it.
> > You should report this to the bzr guys. They do care about
> > peformance, specifically performance on Windows. bzr is not going
> > away any time soon, so you may as well do what you can to help get
> > this fixed.
>
> IIUC what Andy is saying is that the problem is in vc-annotate and not
> in Bzr itself. It is true that vc-annotate is fairly slow (and the same
> holds for grep and compilation output).
FWIW, I tried vc-annotate as well, on Windows, and it was similarly
fast (which is what I'd expect for a small file with a relatively
short history).
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, (continued)
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Andy Moreton, 2011/08/03
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Andy Moreton, 2011/08/04
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/08/03
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/04
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/08/04