[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default
From: |
main |
Subject: |
Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:26:01 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 04:42:37 -0400, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> said:
>> From: محسن بنان
>> <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
>> محسن بنان
>> <address@hidden>
>> Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:04:24 -0700
>>
>>
>> >>>>> On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:44:16 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
said:
>>
Eli> To fix the alignment, you need to append the LRM to each subject:
>>
Eli> :! 2 moons in the sky , August the 27th, يک آسمان و دو ماه|
Eli> 37 |First LAST |Jul 13 '10
Eli> :! Fw: بسیار جالب و خواندنی است ... فقط با دقت و حوصله بخو|
Eli> 284 |First LAST |14:15
Eli> :! Re: Next Saturday instead of this weekend | 36 |First
Eli> LAST |14:22
>>
Eli> See how the line counts are nicely aligned now? I inserted an LRM
Eli> just before the `|' separator to the left of the line count. I did
Eli> that in the last line as well, but there it doesn't matter because the
Eli> subject uses only L2R text.
>>
Eli> To summarize, Gnus should append the LRM to each and every subject it
Eli> puts in the summary buffer.
>>
>> The same thing applies to the From Name.
>> First LAST in the above example.
Eli> But that's only for the possible customization of the summary format,
Eli> right? With the format used in the above example, there's no problem,
Eli> right?
Correct.
I am saying that any field that can be R2L should
have the LRM so that customization of the summary
format would work right.
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, (continued)
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Mohsen BANAN, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, James Cloos, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, James Cloos, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, James Cloos, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Mohsen BANAN, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default,
main <=
Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/02
Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2011/08/01
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Mohsen BANAN, 2011/08/02
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/08/03
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/04
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Kenichi Handa, 2011/08/04
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/04
- Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default, Kenichi Handa, 2011/08/09