[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `C-h v' may offer too many symbols
|
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
|
Subject: |
Re: `C-h v' may offer too many symbols |
|
Date: |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:27:11 +0100 |
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 03:10, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
> Sounds good.
I've installed it.
> FWIW, here's a patch I have pending for the lexbind branch
> (where special-variable-p is t only for vars that have been defvar'd
> or defconst'd).
It makes sense, in a lexical world. However, currently you can do
(defconst :mykeyword :mykeyword)
and even if you add a docstring to that, I'm not sure it is sensible
to show it as a completion of describe-variable...
Juanma
- `C-h v' may offer too many symbols, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/10
- Re: `C-h v' may offer too many symbols, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/03/10
- Re: `C-h v' may offer too many symbols, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/10
- public APIs and private ones (Re: `C-h v' may offer too many symbols), Kenichi Handa, 2011/03/10
- RE: public APIs and private ones (Re: `C-h v' may offer too manysymbols), Drew Adams, 2011/03/11
- Re: public APIs and private ones (Re: `C-h v' may offer too many symbols), Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/11
- Re: public APIs and private ones (Re: `C-h v' may offer too many symbols), Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/11