[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Remove S_IFLNK
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Remove S_IFLNK |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:01:35 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I'd say if we didn't hear about these problems until now, they are not
> important enough to justify such heavyweight changes and added
> complexity with remapping functions, replacing them, etc.
> However, if Stefan and Chong are okay with this, so be it.
I don't care much either way. To me this seems like it's trying to fix
something nobody cares about, but at the same time, the author of the
patch obviously cares enough about it to come up with a patch, so...
If the resulting code is cleaner and/or more efficient, I guess it's
good, but I'm not sure that it is.
Stefan
- Re: windows build failure, (continued)
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/21
- Re: windows build failure, Paul Eggert, 2011/02/21
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/22
- Re: windows build failure, Paul Eggert, 2011/02/22
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/22
- Re: windows build failure, Paul Eggert, 2011/02/22
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/23
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/23
- Re: windows build failure, Paul Eggert, 2011/02/25
- Re: Remove S_IFLNK (was: windows build failure), Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/26
- Re: Remove S_IFLNK,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Remove S_IFLNK, Paul Eggert, 2011/02/26
- Re: Remove S_IFLNK, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/27