[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pretest compilation problem
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: Pretest compilation problem |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:40:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
> Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Chong Yidong wrote:
>>
>>> Adding $(CFLAGS) sounds correct,
>>
>> ALL_CFLAGS used to be there in Emacs 23.1. It was removed in r1.461,
>> 2009-12-16, by Andreas ("Don't compile prefix-args.c twice.")
>> I'm sure he will be happy to provide a detailed explanation.
>
> Since it's no longer compiling there is no need for CFLAGS any more.
Strictly speaking, you're correct. But passing CFLAGS apparently does
no harm. As for the statement that -m32 belongs in CC, I doubt that
most people make that distinction between -m32 and other arguments to
the compiler; at the very least, it is surprising requirement for us to
make.
Unless anyone can come up with a specific example where adding CFLAGS to
this rule causes compilation to do the wrong thing, I'll put it back.
- Pretest compilation problem, Chong Yidong, 2011/02/16
- Re: Pretest compilation problem, Andreas Schwab, 2011/02/16
- CC, CFLAGS, and -m32 [was Re: Pretest compilation problem], Glenn Morris, 2011/02/16
- Re: CC, CFLAGS, and -m32 [was Re: Pretest compilation problem], Paul Eggert, 2011/02/17
- Re: CC, CFLAGS, and -m32 [was Re: Pretest compilation problem], Chong Yidong, 2011/02/19
- Re: CC, CFLAGS, and -m32 [was Re: Pretest compilation problem], Paul Eggert, 2011/02/19
- Re: CC, CFLAGS, and -m32 [was Re: Pretest compilation problem], Miles Bader, 2011/02/17
Re: Pretest compilation problem, Glenn Morris, 2011/02/16